沒問題推薦排行榜

2018-05-05 03:00

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: While banners supporting NTU president-elect Kuan Chung-ming have been hanging for days, those opposing his election were quickly removed, a student saidBy Wu Po-hsuan and Jake Chung / Staff reporter, with staff writerA group of National Taiwan University （NTU） students yesterday accused school authorities of suppressing freedom of speech and applying double standards in its treatment of people who support or oppose Kuan Chung-ming’s （管中閔） election as university president.The Ministry of Education on Friday last week decided not to confirm Kuan’s election after a series of allegations, ranging from conflicts of interest in the selection process to plagiarism and teaching in China, prevented him from taking office as scheduled on Feb. 1.The Action Alliance for University Autonomy, which was formed by a number of academics who support Kuan, have put up banners and yellow ribbons near the university’s bell tower.An NTU student, who wished to only be identified by his surname, Hsu （徐）, said that not everyone at the school supported Kuan, so he and several other students at 3am or 4am yesterday hung up banners saying that they do not want a lawbreaker and that the university election committee does not represent them.However, the banners were moved a few hours later and then removed later that day.Students opposing Kuan said they were simply expressing what they think and that their action did not harm anybody and was not illegal.“Kuan’s supporters are like children, thinking they would win if they were first,” the opposing camp said.Despite his supporters’ calls for freedom of speech and school autonomy, they have no true faith in what they claim, for they do not respect the principles behind them, the opposition camp said.Students who favor Kuan are unable to provide a legal basis for their support and are hiding behind vague claims, such as political oppression and trampling on university autonomy, they said.Kuan should clearly state his position and face the issue like a true academic, instead of resorting to emotional manipulation and saying: “I will not dance to their tune,” they said.If school authorities were involved in the removal of the banners, then the school has adopted double standards in its treatment of the protests, they said.Banners supporting Kuan have been left untouched for days, while those opposing Kuan were removed within a day, they said.NTU would be a false democracy and a supporter of authoritarianism if they were involved, they added.新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES

教育部確定管中閔無法接任台大校長之後，引發很多的議論，泛藍民眾因此大團結，中間選民也憤怒，台大、清華等校都發表聲明抗議，未來校園裡會不會躁動，發展出藍版「太陽花」眾所矚目。管中閔聲勢也水漲船高，國民黨內開始打管中閔主意，希望這次初選出線的人選可以再跟管比民調，讓管有機會代表國民黨贏回台北。

據了解，發生台大卡管事件後，國民黨內就有人提議暫緩台北市長黨內初選，可以「稍微」等一下管案結果，不過，當時管案發展並未明朗，加上基層及候選人要求趕快決定的聲音很大，於是國民黨敲定時間，但確定時間會議的過程也曾有雜音並且見諸報章。

上周五新任教育部長果然對於管案做出了裁決，不出所料，封殺管中閔，這案件引起了泛藍人士極大反彈，在政治效果上造成了藍軍的大團結，可由於管案中，台大校方出現的若干遴選行政瑕疵，以及管中閔的處置不佳，是否足夠構成不能擔任校長的理由，是否有比例原則失當問題，也引發比較中間的選民質疑，台大內部更反彈聲四起。

更無法自圓其說的，被問及管中閔是否可以再選下一次校長時，新任教育部長吳茂昆第一時間說不行，到了周日卻又說可以，那不是自打嘴巴嗎？如果管中閔仍有資格選校長，只因為這次的行政疏失而被取消，豈不自相矛盾？尤其，吳茂昆的爭議不比管中閔少，教育界質疑為何卡管不卡吳？

一時之間，批評吳茂昆聲音非常大，要求部長下台，甚有廢教育部的言論，尤其清華大學的聲明舉「台灣人四百年史」打臉獨派，慷慨激昂，振振有詞，憾動不少人，未來校園裡如何反應，對民進黨政府形成多少壓力，有待觀察。

不過，管中閔的聲勢卻無形中水漲船高，卡管後不久，周末國民黨的基層群組，即傳出黨應該要徵召管中閔選台北市長，陸續有人呼應，還舉出具體辦法希望這二天初選結束的勝利者，可以再跟管中閔比民調，如果管中閔勝了，應該徵召管中閔，還說了一大堆陳水扁選輸台北市才選上總統，柯文哲因為有監院調查等才有台北市長，管中閔有卡管案也該有政治能量等等理由，顯見基層對於卡管案的反彈。

不過，據了解，也有人去探問管的意願，管的意願並不高，而且初選勝選者同意的可能性也不高，眼前請管中閔選台北市長只停留在基層的盼望之中，但隨著情勢的變化，未來會不會有意外，誰也想像不到。

一旦管中閔願意出戰首都，受到最大衝擊的乃是現任台北市長柯文哲，柯文哲的大罵是那個白痴決策的？固然講出他泛藍及中間選民的意見，但多少可以看出柯文哲面對強敵可能出現的緊張態度。

一向主張民主自由和大學自治的民進黨，在執政之後，做出了令人驚訝的卡管案，對台灣政局和台北市長選戰格局，都可能因此有了不同的轉變。後勢嚴陣以待。

●作者：陳敏鳳／資深媒體人

●本文為作者評論意見，不代表《NOWnews今日新聞》立場

●《今日觀點》開拓不同的視野

●《今日廣場》歡迎來稿或參與討論，請附真實姓名及聯絡電話，文章歡迎寄至public@nownews.com

香港行政特首林鄭月娥表示，她上任後一直很尊重大學院校的自主。中通社 分享 facebook 香港行政長官（特首）林鄭月娥今天說，她上任後一直很尊重大學院校的自主，並已通知院校不要事事詢問她。她在立法會答覆議員質詢大學撥款和院校自主問題時，作了以上表示。.inline-ad { position: relative; overflow: hidden; box-sizing: border-box; }

.inline-ad div { margin: auto; text-align: center; }

.inline-ad iframe { margin: auto; display: block; /*width: auto !important;*/ }

.inline-ad div[id^=google_ads_iframe] {

padding: 50px 0 30px;

}

.inline-ad div[id^=google_ads_iframe]:before {

content: "推薦";

font-size:13px;

color:#999;

text-align:left;

border-top: 1px solid #d9d9d9;

width: 100%;

position: absolute;

top: 15px;

left: 0;

padding-top: 5px;

}

.inline-ad div[id^=google_ads_iframe]:after {

content: "";

border-bottom: 1px solid #d9d9d9;

width: 100%;

position: absolute;

bottom: 15px;

left: 0;

}

.innity-apps-reset { padding: 20px 0 0 !important; margin: -20px auto -10px !important; } 林鄭月娥說，雖然特首身兼大學校監，但這只是禮節性職銜，各大專院校應該發揮自己的管理能力，處理好大學內部各種問題。在港英政府時代，總督是政府資助大專院校的校監，這種制度沿用至今。前幾年，尤其「占領中環運動」發生期間，大學校園內有人提出取消校監制度，特首不再兼任校監。此外，近年大學出現「港獨」問題，這引起外界關注政府會否介入處理，從而影響學校的自主性。但客觀上，目前本地大學的自主性還沒有受到外來衝擊。